Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
AnonymousParticipant
Say what?
Golang is being used in many production environments.
It is not a research project anymore, and that has been the case since a couple years ago or more.
Google is using it in several prod environments. Other companies (the one I’m currently working right now is using it for a high performance, high reliability) http server.
I would say, the only drawback so far is that Golang needs gdb to be debugged properly, so if you don’t have a tool that uses gdb, like VS, then you pretty much can’t debug it.AnonymousParticipantI just emailed support about this very issue for exactly the same reasons.
AnonymousParticipantFor what i have read there isn’t any “massive” changes / bugs / feature request, I hope that we would all be “satisfied” by basiz 😉
AnonymousParticipantI just thought of my case.
Good that you said that.
Yes, an option to create ISO Files of any Folders / Drives would be greatAnonymousParticipantWhy limitate it to a “Physical Drive” only? Can be anything, the code doesn’t change if you create from a folder or from a mounted image/phisical drive
CreateISO "C:MyFolder" "C:ISO of MyFolder.iso
AnonymousParticipantSorry I forgot to say what CreateISO should do.
with a CreateISO Parameter in the command line I would like to create an ISO-File from a Physical Drive (CD/DVD)
Example with Physical Drive (CD/DVD) F:CreateISO F: C:ISO_from_F.iso
After that I would like to silently mount the iso “ISO_from_F.iso” to any Virtual Drive. (implemented though)
best regards,
AnonymousParticipantAnonymousParticipantYes, I did install BazisLib 3.0.
I can give more informations laterAnonymousParticipantA parameter for CreateISO would be good to see in your program.
AnonymousParticipantAlot of people really NEED a compilable version of your Project. Would you mind uploading it all again in a version which is really compilable without any errors?
AnonymousParticipantCreate an ISO for any folder is an addition id’ like to see also for the portable version
AnonymousParticipantok, man
I have a problem, in UltraISO i could make an ISO image for my flash memory or from some separated files by adding ’em to the image, but i could not do it now with WinCDemu cuz it’s just make ISO image for the DVD drive.
thanks
AnonymousParticipantThunder said them all 😀
I can add, always for the portable version, a separate file for the Language. So anyone can traslate it in every language without edit directly the executable with a resource editor
ThanksAnonymousParticipantOh man, finally 🙂
Thank you.My requests ( aren’t all mine but from my thread, so other many people ask for that ) are all for the Portable version
1) Make batchmnt command line work also for the Portable version. In additional was better if you add two parameter, /install and /uninstall for the portable driver. With this two parameter the command line became another software, pratically a standalone CLI for mounting the image without rewrite the entire software. Isn’t this cool? Yes it is.
2) Resolve the bug “The specified service has been marked for deletion“
How to reproduce:
a) Open WinCDEmu
b) Click OK – Install driver
c) Uninstall the driver
d) Open Wincdemu
e) Click OK – Install driver
f) ERROR:
Driver installation failed:
The specified service has been marked for deletionActually we have only two solution:
a) Reboot the system and WinCdEmu can install the driver
b) Open cmd –> type “driverquery” without quotes, press the ENTER key and WinCdEmu can install the driver3) Better cleanup the registry. After uninstalling the driver, WinCDEmu leaves some traces on the register, here:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESYSTEMControlSet001ServicesBazisPortableCDBus HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESYSTEMCurrentControlSetServicesBazisPortableCDBus HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESYSTEMControlSet001EnumRootLEGACY_BAZISPORTABLECDBUS HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESYSTEMCurrentControlSetEnumRootLEGACY_BAZISPORTABLECDBUS
So if i uninstall the driver is better to remove all that unused registry key
4) Add a feature ( in additional ) for remove the mouted image and NOT the drive directly. With some multi-disk installation is a real problem because search for the same drive but the drive change everytime you mount an image so pratically don’t recognize the disk
5) Resolve a little interface glitch when you make the window bigger:
I don’t know if you want to use the same iterface of the installed version, personally i don’t care about the interface i prefer a working functionality softwareI think I have summarized all the most requested-features, I hope i did not forget any 😀
AnonymousParticipant@wks wrote:
@bazis wrote:
Hi,
The root cause for this message is incompatibility between the debug information issued by GCC and read by GDB. If you encounter it again, try experimenting with the -gdwarf-
GCC flag. hi,brother
thanks very much
It’s was useful when i debug with gcc
but when i try to debug with g++
it still tell me “-var-create: unable to create variable object”i have aleady solves it.with these command:
dpkg -l |grep ii | grep gcc
dpkg -l |grep ii | grep g++
sudo rm /usr/bin/gcc
sudo rm /usr/bin/g++
sudo ln -s /usr/bin/gcc-4.6 /usr/bin/gcc
sudo ln -s /usr/bin/g++-4.6 /usr/bin/g++and now,we don’t need the “-gdwarf-2”
my os is ubuntu 14.04. i had update my gcc and g++ to 4.8 .
now i choice to use 4.6.
my first language is not english… I hope the information can help others. =_= -
AuthorPosts