Signed integer types intellisense error

Sysprogs forums Forums VisualGDB Signed integer types intellisense error

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #11283
    Blutti
    Participant

    When debugging with VisualGDB, the ‘signed-ness’ seems to be wrong in the intellisense. Using the following code:
    <Type> difference;
    <Type> desiredVal = 10;
    <Type> actualVal = 21;
    difference = desiredVal - actualVal;

    difference should be -11 for signed types and some random large number (type_max – 10) for unsigned types. However, it does not follow these rules for some reason.
    From the limited debugging I found that the following types are correct “(un)signed int” & “(un)signed char” and I assume other “standard” types like these will work correctly as well.
    However it using the “(u)intN_t” types, this behaviour seems to be flipped. For example when using the “uint8_t” type it returns as -11. And if you use “int8_t” it returns 245.

    It should be noted that it will behave normally in other code. For example if the following code is appended to the code above:
    if (difference < -10)
    int a = 2;

    The “intN_t” types will hit the int a = 2 line. While “uintN_t” types will, correctly, skip it.
    The issue appears to be only visual.

    I am using VisualGDB on an STM32F411VET (devboard) with the following package versions:
    ARM toolchain: 6.2.0/7.12/r3
    STM32 Devices: 4.2
    OpenOCD: 20161025

    *Edited to fix code blocks (twice :))

    • This topic was modified 6 years, 11 months ago by Blutti.
    • This topic was modified 6 years, 11 months ago by Blutti.
    #11306
    support
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    We have recently fixed a similar problem in our development branch. Please try this build to see if it solves the problem: http://sysprogs.com/files/tmp/VisualGDB-5.3.1.1554.msi

    If not, please let us know what type is shown for those variables in the Watch window (VisualGDB uses it to determine the correct format).

    #11307
    Blutti
    Participant

    This build appears to solve the problem. Thank you for the quick responds!

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.