Resources in Tree (Feature)

Sysprogs forums Forums VisualGDB Resources in Tree (Feature)

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #23244
    aronrubin
    Participant

    This is a feature request for CMake projects. Please consider adding the files listed in the RESOURCE property of each target within the solution explorer tree. This now works with install(TARGET) on all platforms.

    https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/prop_tgt/RESOURCE.html

    Thank you,
    Aron

    #23249
    support
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    Thanks for the suggestion. Based on a quick research, it looks like a iOS/MacOS-specific feature. As this is a relatively rare use case for VisualGDB, we will not be able to add it as a regular VisualGDB feature. However, if you could confirm that CMake reports the resources via the JSON code model interface (or could prepare a patch to our open-source CMake fork that will export this information via the JSON model), we should be able to modify VisualGDB to display the resources in Solution Explorer.

    #23255
    aronrubin
    Participant
    set_property(TARGET ${TGT_NAME} APPEND PROPERTY RESOURCE ${TGT_LIST_OF_FILES})

    Together with

    install(TARGETS ${TGT_NAME}
      RUNTIME DESTINATION bin
      RESOURCE DESTINATION "share/${PROJECT_NAME}"
    )

    Will install resources as needed on every platform, not just Apple anymore. More importantly for my purposes, CPack will put the files in an installer/deb/pkg/rpm/zip on a component basis. Note BundleUtilities is not only for Apple anymore and can be used to package non-project DLLs in a Windows installer.

    Aron

     

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 3 months ago by support. Reason: formatting
    #23259
    support
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    Sorry, this still looks like a relatively rarely used feature, so we will only be able to support it if CMake itself reports the resources via the JSON code model interface.

    #23261
    aronrubin
    Participant

    I see now; properties are not reported in the code model. I did not realize that before. This explains much. Do you happen to have insight into why there is no property query facility?

    #23264
    support
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    The CMake code model reporting logic is generally relatively simple and only covers a few most common parameters. We extended it a lot in our CMake fork (including the ability to step through CMake files) and we may eventually add support for reporting generic properties (or specifically resources), however currently we cannot promise any timeframe for this. Please consider creating a patch for our CMake fork that will report the necessary information (alternatively we could give you a quote for developing this as a custom feature).

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.