support

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 6,811 through 6,825 (of 7,726 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: tool useless ? Refactor doesnt work ? #6536
    support
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    VisualGDB refactoring is supported via smart tags. Currently we support the following features:
    1. When you rename a variable, a smart tag will appear allowing you to update all references.
    2. When you click on an interface specification that is not implemented by a class, VisualGDB will show a smart tag allowing to implement missing methods
    3. Similarly when you type in a declaration for a new method, VisualGDB will show a smart tag allowing to generate implementation.
    4. If you call a function/method/constructor that does not exist yet, VisualGDB will show a smart tag allowing you to create it.

    You can read more about the refactoring features here: http://sysprogs.com/w/visualgdb-5-0-beta-1-refactoring-and-c-codemap/

    in reply to: STM32L053 Discovery & openOCD #6517
    support
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    We will add an OpenOCD 0.9.0 package as a part of the upcoming VisualGDB 5.0 release. It should improve the integration with the new ST devices. The main issue of the Texane tool is that sometimes it leaves the ST-Link in an invalid state and does not start another session unless you unplug and replug it. OpenOCD does not have this problem.

    Could you provide some examples of things poorly documented in VisualGDB project samples so that we could improve that?

    in reply to: Building Whole Solution on Linux #6516
    support
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    The makefiles are generated on project level to avoid better flexibility (e.g. combining projects using different build systems in one solution). In order to build all projects in the solution from Linux, you can simply create a script that will invoke Make for each project, e.g.:
    make -C project1 || exit 1
    make -C subdir/project2 || exit 1

    make -C projectN || exit 1

    in reply to: Cannot exec … Permission denied. #6501
    support
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    Normally VisualGDB should run the ‘chmod’ command automatically. Does it also happen with an empty “hello, world” project on the same board?

    in reply to: VisualGDB 5.0 missing "Open Document" context menu? #6500
    support
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    VisualGDB 5.0 Beta 2 is out.

    in reply to: VisualGDB 5.0 missing "Open Document" context menu? #6473
    support
    Keymaster

    Hi,
    This will be fixed in VisualGDB 5.0 Beta 2. As a workaround, use the Go To Definition (F12) command instead.

    in reply to: setting section / variable address #6466
    support
    Keymaster

    There are 2 ways of achieving this:

    An undocumented way that may be broken in the further versions of GCC would look like this:

    extern const int nErasedFlag asm("0x0807F800");

    A classical “supported” approach would be similar to what CooCox version uses: put the variable into a separate section and modify the linker script to place this section at a given address.

    You can read more about this here: http://sysprogs.com/w/forums/topic/bootloader/

    in reply to: STM32CubeMx Project with VisualGDB? #6458
    support
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    You can try further reducing the size of your binary by switching the libc to newlib-nano and experimenting with other libc options on the Device Settings page.

    Also feel free to check out the new IntelliSense engine of VisualGDB 5.0. It is designed to handle GCC-specific code and supports refactoring and Code Map.

    in reply to: follow-fork-mode #6457
    support
    Keymaster

    Most likely your daemon tries to launch some other executable before handling your command. VisualGDB “follows” that launch and ends the debug session when it exits.

    Please try running the set follow-fork-mode command manually via the GDB Session window just before you expect your binary to run the child job.

    You can also enable GDB logging in the Quick Debug window and examine the log for any additional clues.

    in reply to: license transfer #6449
    support
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    Please forward your activation key to our support so that we can deactivate it. Note that there is some problem with your current email address. We regularly get “delivery failed” reports from your email provider. Please contact us from an alternate email.

    support
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    Currently it is not possible to create the project without a board directly, however you can copy the .vgdbsettings file and the Makefile (with all .mak files) from an existing project. This will transfer your settings to the new project. Please also note that we will be adding support for creating projects without connection to a board in the final release of VisualGDB 5.0.

    in reply to: SIGTRAP breaks the debug session #6442
    support
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    Thanks for reporting this. Looks like there is a bug in our semihosting handler that triggers when used with the texane/ST-Link tool. Please try the following build: http://visualgdb.com/tmp/VisualGDB-5.0.5.355.msi

    in reply to: Tool Chain for ESP8266 #6440
    support
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    We have looked into it and will be getting some ESP8266 boards to investigate the complexity of adding a BSP for it. Feel free to follow us on Twitter (@Sysprogs) to stay updated.

    Update: here you go.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 4 months ago by support.
    in reply to: VisualGDB 5.0 Beta1 Bugs #6439
    support
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    The clang version we use has the c++1y, not c++14 syntax. We will add an alias to the final release, though.

    The Include directories and Linker script are managed by GNU Make and do not have access to VisualGDB variables. You can simply use relative paths to specify something relatively to the project directory or create a per-user variable (Custom edition and higher) and select to propagate it to GNU Make.

    in reply to: VisualGDB Educational License #6438
    support
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    Looks like you have misspelled the domain name. It should be sysprogs.com, not sysprog.com.

Viewing 15 posts - 6,811 through 6,825 (of 7,726 total)