kurta999

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: mbed: newlib-nano with floating-point support #25695
    kurta999
    Participant
    in reply to: Importing STM32CubeMX LL project #24075
    kurta999
    Participant

    HAL is crap, it’s just for beginners. We are used it for commercial modules, but now I’m planning to move everything to low layer & raw register access. Anyway Congratulations for Visual GDB, I’m now trying to push my boss to buy a license (It’s a big plus that it works with ESP too) and throw out Atollic.  It’s a messy nonsense IDE. They fix a bug, creates two new.

     

    “This could be a bug worth reporting to ST and if it’s not fixed in one of the next STM32CubeMX updates, we will consider adding logic for detecting this and automatically adding the macro and skipping the missing file.”

     

    Good luck with that 😀 If VisualGDB staff can afford it, then please fix this because interest is here.

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 8 months ago by kurta999.
    • This reply was modified 5 years, 8 months ago by kurta999.
    in reply to: STM32 not behaving after optimization #23488
    kurta999
    Participant

    The problem can be in HAL too. Eg: USB CDC doesn’t work for me with “optimize for speed”, I had to lower it  to “optimize more”. (i’m not going to fix a driver myself which ST has f*cked up..)

    in reply to: Switching from Atollic, my evaluation so far. #22213
    kurta999
    Participant

    Still no plans on implementing this popup feature from Atollic?

     

    I would recommend try to compare which is better in Atollic, and try to implement these features 🙂 In future we’ll buy a few license that’s sure, since now this visual gdb rocks with ESP support & newly added features.

    in reply to: Importing projects from Atollic TrueStudio #21955
    kurta999
    Participant

    Did you plan to implement this feature in final 5.4? If yes, our team would use sometime atollic, sometime visual gdb.

    • This reply was modified 6 years, 1 month ago by kurta999.
    in reply to: Switching from Atollic, my evaluation so far. #12474
    kurta999
    Participant

    Okey, no problem. I very appreciate it that you looked after.

    Anyway the situation is the same with other expressions like ‘+’, ‘-‘, ‘>>’, ‘<<‘ etc? In attolic this works for all expression, not for only ‘(‘ ‘)’.

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 1 month ago by kurta999.
    in reply to: Switching from Atollic, my evaluation so far. #12378
    kurta999
    Participant

    It would be possible to show expressions in debugger?

    In attolic, there is an example code:
    int32_t Vdd = 3300 * (*VREFINT_CAL) / vdd;
    int32_t temperature = (((int32_t)adc_temp * Vdd / 3300)- (int32_t) *TEMP30_CAL_ADDR );
    temperature = temperature * (int32_t)(110 – 30);
    temperature = temperature / (int32_t)(*TEMP110_CAL_ADDR – *TEMP30_CAL_ADDR);

    If my cursor is on first ( in debug mode, then debugger will show a window with this expresison value. Like:

     

    int32_t temperature = (((int32_t)adc_temp * Vdd / 3300)- (int32_t) *TEMP30_CAL_ADDR );

     

    Result:

    Name : (((int32_t)adc_temp * Vdd / 3300)- (int32_t) *TEMP30_CAL_ADDR )
    Details:7
    Default:7
    Decimal:7

     

    If my curson on the second (, result will be:
    Name : ((int32_t)adc_temp * Vdd / 3300)
    Details:1767
    Default:1767
    Decimal:1767

     

    If my cursor is on minus sign, it will show:

    Name : ((int32_t)adc_temp * Vdd / 3300) – (int32_t) *TEMP30_CAL_ADDR
    Details:7
    Default:7
    Decimal:7

     

    I think this is the most useful feature in attolic, I very miss this from GDB. With this method I can find very easy, where I made a mistake in the expression. This works for every expression (+,-,/,*,%,||,&,>>, etc..) and for casts too.

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 1 month ago by kurta999.
    • This reply was modified 7 years, 1 month ago by kurta999.
    • This reply was modified 7 years, 1 month ago by kurta999.
    • This reply was modified 7 years, 1 month ago by kurta999.
    in reply to: Switching from Atollic, my evaluation so far. #12311
    kurta999
    Participant

    Awesome!

    Thanks!

    in reply to: Switching from Atollic, my evaluation so far. #12295
    kurta999
    Participant

    We also planning to move from Attolic to GDB. Visual Studio is better than Eclipse, IMO, but I miss these things :
    – Intellisense and debugger isn’t show size of “sizeof” when you hover cursor trough. This should be done, I very miss this feature. This feature also present in ReSharper. It also works for operators, like if I hover cursor trough ==, in this case: saved_data.dev_addr[0] == 0, debugger will show that this is false, because dev_addr is not null.
    – In debugger you can only view values at hex or dec, in attolic you can see it also in binary, octal & char form.

    It is possible to check what is stack pointer in GDB?

     

    In attolic it’s like:

    General Registers General Purpose and FPU Register Group
    r0 536872224
    r1 536872282
    r2 32
    r3 32
    r4 -1
    r5 -1
    r6 -1
    r7 536879080
    r8 -1
    r9 -1
    r10 -1
    r11 -1
    r12 -1073872904
    sp 0x20001fe8
    lr 134237211
    pc 0x80056d8 <mm_initialize+24>
    xpsr 1627389952
    PRIMASK 0
    BASEPRI 0
    FAULTMASK 0
    CONTROL 0
    MSP 536879080
    PSP -4

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 2 months ago by kurta999.
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)