Hi,

Considering moving to VisualGDB as our primary development tool.

At the last stages of import from Keil, I am having difficulties matching the batch file to that of Keil.

Primarily, in VisualGDB I can’t get my .S files to compile in a different manner than my c files.

Comparing .BAT files for  irq_cm4f.S  file shows that :

Our Keil project:

For .S files it uses ArmAsm : “C:\Keil_v5\ARM\ArmCompilerforEmbeddedFuSa6.16.2\Bin\ArmAsm” –Via “.\obj\app_migo_stm32wb55vgq\irq_cm4f._ia”, and a unique ._ia file for settings.

( This opposed to C files that have .__i files for configuration and use ArmClang  “C:\Keil_v5\ARM\ArmCompilerforEmbeddedFuSa6.16.2\Bin\ArmClang.exe” @”.\obj\app_migo_stm32wb55vgq\stm32wbxx_hal.__i )

Visual GDB:

All files have the same settings files that end with .rsp. (that got me thinking if that is actually possible to have a different file setting for .S files ?)

In contrary to Keil, it uses ArmClang for .S files:

C:\Keil_v5\ARM\ArmCompilerforEmbeddedFuSa6.16.2\bin\armclang.exe @”VisualGDB/Debug/_2_/PNG_RTX_FUSA_RTOS/CMSIS/RTOS2/RTX/Source/ARM/irq_cm4f.gcc.rsp” || exit 1

I tried ticking “Build assembly files using C files” -> No.  Didn’t help!

How can I match the batch files to create the same compilation output?

Same compilation tool and flags.

Thanks!

• This topic was modified 1 year, 1 month ago by dmas.
• This topic was modified 1 year, 1 month ago by dmas.